Zoom Logo

State Planning Office Work Program Update ā€“ continuing to build the Tasmanian Planning system - Shared screen with speaker view
Tom O'Connor
26:13
yeah
Emma Riley
27:35
Communications and updates need to be to all players in the system not just local government.
Indra Boss
31:40
Is that what happens when we cut red and green tape?
Andrew Holmes
32:29
Is it possible to put a feedback form on the iPlan website so people can actually provide feedback on the planning scheme? Where are people supposed to provide comments on the scheme?
Michael Edrich
33:29
Great idea Andrew.
Roger Cooper
43:32
Will the State policy reform address the gaps between leading State polices and the proposed new TPPs?
Emma Riley
48:00
Why do we have to wait for the TPP's to be prepared and the SPP's reviewed to have the apartment code introduced? It is needed now in the TPS given the amount of this type of development being proposed.
Adriaan Stander
51:23
Thank you for the regional planning framework slides. It would be good to acknowledge local land use strategies (and their status) as part of this body of work too.
Fiona Brine
53:27
If you are serious about wanting to know what is going on in the real world, how about producing a SoE Report, long overdue!
Indra Boss
53:37
How are we defining 'fit for purpose' and how do we measure it is being achieved? Will the State of Environment Report or something similar be incorporated as an integral part of this toolset? I think we need some 'out of process' measures of success.
Beck Harrison
55:16
Thank you Brian. Very informative
Andrew Holmes
01:00:15
Thanks, I will give you a buzz
Tasha Tyler-Moore
01:01:40
When are we getting the other amendments to the SPP's and what appears in PDB that did not come in last month? We were consulted on them late last year eg the outbuilding exemption clause and other wording in exemptions that simply don't work or make sense?
Indra Boss
01:08:36
Thanks Brian - I acknowledge we are working in a complex system.
Karen Abey
01:09:31
Will LGBMP be part of the review process? There is still confusion about how LGBMP integrates with the scheme requirements eg min lot size. (Iā€™m not familiar with the SPPs so apologies if this body of work has already been done)
James Bonner
01:11:48
My suggestion is to move all planning provisions out of LGBMP and into LUPPA
Michael Edrich
01:13:21
Thanks Brian, very informative presentation. There is a lot of work here for the SPO - can you advise how these streams of work will be prioritised? Which ones will take priority over others?
Michael Edrich
01:13:39
And do you feel the Tasmanian Government has adequately resourced this work to achieve it in a (reasonable) timeframe? I acknowledge some flexibility will need to be afforded to juggle this bulk of work.
James Bonner
01:14:21
Thanks Brian an dMick,
Jen Welch
01:14:41
Thanks Brian and Mick. Great discussion.
James Bonner
01:14:49
looking forward to the consultation phases, especially the SPPs.
Andrew Holmes
01:14:55
Thanks everyone
Lisa Stafford
01:14:58
thank you Brian and Mick !
Bunfu Yu
01:15:04
Thank you!
Rachael Huby
01:15:06
thank you - great that it will be available for others in my team (non-PIA members!)
Adriaan Stander
01:15:07
Thanks Brain & Mick.
Theresa Hatton
01:15:11
thank you
Sandra Hogue
01:15:15
Thanks Brian
Rachael Huby
01:15:27
thanks Mick!